Social Networks

30  Structural Balance

  • Welcome
  • Introduction to Networks
  • 1  What Are Networks?
  • 2  What is A Social Network?
  • Graph Theory: The Basics
  • 3  Introduction to Graphs
  • 4  Graphs and their Subgraphs
  • 5  Types of Ties and Their Graphs
  • 6  Basic Graph Metrics
  • 7  Nodes and their Neighborhoods
  • 8  Nodes and their Degrees
  • 9  Degree-Based Graph Metrics
  • 10  Indirect Connections
  • 11  Directed Indirect Connections
  • 12  Graph Connectivity
  • Matrices: The Basics
  • 13  Introduction to Matrices
  • 14  The Adjacency Matrix
  • 15  Matrix Operations: Row and Column Sums
  • 16  Basic Matrix Operations
  • 17  Matrix Multiplication
  • Centrality
  • 18  Centralities based on Degree
  • 19  Centralities based on the Geodesic Distance
  • 20  Centralities based on Shortest Paths
  • 21  The “Big Three” Centrality Metrics
  • Prestige
  • Two-Mode Networks
  • 22  Affiliation Networks
  • Ego Networks
  • 23  Ego Network Metrics
  • 24  Collecting Ego-Network Data
  • Subgroups and Blocks
  • 25  Clique Analysis
  • 26  Equivalence and Similarity
  • 27  Local Node Similarities
  • Network Theory
  • 28  Dyadic Balance
  • 29  Triadic Balance
  • 30  Structural Balance
  • 31  Valenced Interactions
  • 32  Dominance Hiearchies
  • 33  Diffusion

Table of contents

  • 30.1 The Fundamental Theorem of Structural Balance
    • 30.1.1 Balance Does Not Necessarily Imply a “Good” Social State
  • 30.2 Cycles in a Balanced Signed Graph
  • 30.3 Paths in a Balanced Signed Graph
  • References

View source

30  Structural Balance

The concept of balance can be extended from individual triads to the entire social network, which is analyzed at the whole network level. This extension is known as Structural Balance Theory.

In its original formulation, structural balance theory applies to complete signed graphs. A signed graph is a special kind of graph featuring one set of vertices (nodes) and two disjoint sets of edges: positive links (E+) and negative links (E-).

A complete signed graph is one where every node is connected to every other node by either a positive or a negative link. In an adjacency matrix representation of a signed graph, positive links are typically represented by +1, negative links by -1, and non-adjacent nodes by 0, though for structural balance, it is often applied to complete graphs where all connections exist.

30.1 The Fundamental Theorem of Structural Balance

The Fundamental Theorem of Structural Balance was discovered by mathematicians Dorwin Cartwright and Frank Harary in 1956 (Cartwright and Harary 1956). This theorem states that if a complete signed graph only contains balanced triads (i.e., every triad within the network is balanced as defined in Chapter 29), then the graph itself is considered balanced.

Furthermore, such a balanced graph can be divided into two groups such that:

  1. There are only positive links within each group.
  2. There are only negative links between the two groups.

This theorem implies that structural balance is equivalent to perfect group polarization. For example, in a balanced network, nodes A, B, and F might form one group with positive ties among themselves, while nodes C, D, and E form another group with positive ties among themselves, and all ties between these two groups would be negative. In a balanced graph, the polarized structure of these two distinct groups can be recovered by rearranging the rows and columns of the signed adjacency matrix such that nodes in the same group are near one another.

A remarkable property of a structurally balanced graph is its resilience to change in its overall polarized structure. If new nodes are added to a structurally balanced graph, the existing group polarization pattern does not change, provided that the new nodes’ relationships to every other existing node are also balanced.

Essentially, any new node entering such a network will inherently fall into one of the two existing polarized groups, maintaining the internal positive ties and external negative ties, thus keeping the network polarized.

30.1.1 Balance Does Not Necessarily Imply a “Good” Social State

Despite the term “balanced,” this state does not inherently denote a harmonious or desirable social situation. On the contrary, structural balance describes a stable state of maximal polarization and potential conflict, such as seen in political polarization (e.g., Republicans versus Democrats).

This theoretical framework helps explain how factions or polarized groups can form and persist within larger social networks. It is a mathematical property indicating a specific configuration of relationships, not a judgment of social well-being. This nuance is crucial for understanding the implications of balance theory in real-world social networks.

30.2 Cycles in a Balanced Signed Graph

The direct consequence of this two-group partitioning for cycles within a balanced signed graph is as follows: All cycles in a balanced signed graph must have a positive product of signs.

**Cycles entirely within one group*: If a cycle exists entirely within one of the two polarized groups (e.g., within Group 1 or Group 2), then all the edges forming that cycle must be positive, as per the theorem. The product of any number of positive signs is always positive. Therefore, these cycles are inherently “balanced” in terms of their sign product.

Cycles spanning between two groups: If a cycle involves nodes from both polarized groups, it must cross between the groups an even number of times to return to its starting node. For instance, to go from Group 1 to Group 2 and then back to Group 1, it must cross the “boundary” twice. Each time a link crosses between the two groups, it carries a negative sign. If there’s an even number of such negative links in the cycle, then the product of all the signs in the cycle will be positive (because an even number of negative signs multiplied together results in a positive product).

30.3 Paths in a Balanced Signed Graph

Recall that a path is a sequence of distinct vertices and edges connecting a start node to an end node. The sign of the path is the product of the sign of each edge in the path. In a balanced graph, the end nodes of a path could belong to the same group, or each could belong to different groups in the polarized structure.

  1. Paths with End Nodes in the Same Group: If a path begins and ends within the same polarized group (e.g., both start and end nodes are in Group 1, or both are in Group 2), the product of the signs of its edges will always be positive.

Reasoning: To start and end in the same group, the path must either stay entirely within that group (meaning all its links are positive, and thus their product is positive), or it must cross between the two groups an even number of times. Each time the path crosses from one group to the other, it traverses a negative link (by definition of the two-group partition). Since an even number of negative links multiplied together results in a positive sign (-1 * -1 = +1), and any within-group links are positive, the overall product of signs for the entire path will be positive.

  1. Paths with End Nodes in Different Groups: If a path begins in one polarized group and ends in the other (e.g., starts in Group 1 and ends in Group 2), the product of the signs of its edges will always be negative.

Reasoning: To connect nodes in different groups, the path must necessarily cross the boundary between the two groups an odd number of times. Each time it crosses, it utilizes a negative link. Since an odd number of negative links multiplied together results in a negative sign (+1 * -1 = -1), the overall product of signs for the entire path will be negative.

In summary, the two-group partitioning, which is a hallmark of structural balance in complete signed graphs, creates a predictable environment for path signs. Paths that “stay” within their original group’s alignment (by ending in the same group) maintain a positive sign, while paths that “cross” the fundamental division of the network (by ending in a different group) acquire a negative sign, reflecting the inherent polarization.

References

Cartwright, Dorwin, and Frank Harary. 1956. “Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory.” Psychological Review 63 (5): 277–93.
29  Triadic Balance
31  Valenced Interactions